AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Film anaconda 1997 movie2/12/2024 The upside is that the rest of you will be perfectly safe from further snake attack because it's gonna take that python around an hour to eat Steve, and days to digest him. You know the old joke about, "I don't have to outrun the bear, I just have to outrun you"? Well, if you're in a group of people and one of you gets grabbed by a python and eaten, then that's just too bad for Steve. Secondly, even if a snake managed to eat an adult person, that'd be it. And few horror films are willing to be so transgressive as to have their monster snake devouring babies and children. ![]() Or, in some unfortunate cases, a snake smelling a prey animal that the human was trying to feed them and grabbing the human instead.įor some reason, though, people seem to find the idea of just being killed but not eaten less horrifying than being a successful lunch. Our body structure also doesn't lend itself well to being swallowed whole, and snakes can't eat any other way. That's not to say that snakes don't try, often resulting in an adult being killed but not devoured: it's simply a case of their eyes being bigger than their stomachs. An infant or small child is, unsurprisingly, at risk of being a snake's prey but there are very few verified cases of an adult human being eaten by a snake because there are very few snakes actually large enough to eat an adult. One, snakes generally don't eat people-or at least, not adult humans. It's a futile effort, most of the time, but it's exceptionally Sisyphean in the case of movies about snakes eating people. I'm sure that old fairy tale about snakes and apples doesn't help matters.Īll of this is to say that if a movie wants me to be scared of a snake it has to really work for it. In fact, many snakebite victims are people decided to react to the presence of a snake by killing it and karma got them when the dead snake's reflex actions made it bite them. And, in general, snakes are unfairly maligned creatures with far more to fear from us than we have from them. I know that, most of the time, snakes can be very sweet-tempered pets. We had pet snakes all my life, from tiny garter snakes to a six foot long bull snake. I'm not an idiot.Ī lot of this comes from my mother, who has always loved snakes. The mere sight of one does not make my hair stand on end and if I see one in the wild I'm just as likely to walk over for a closer look as run in the other direction-provided we're talking about just a harmless non-venomous snake, that is. ![]() I don't have a deep-down, ingrained, irrational fear of snakes. While the bizarre kills and plot of Lake Placid vs Anaconda might be worth a watch on next bad movie night, the third and fourth film stray too far into 'bad TV movie' without enough insanity to take them all the way into 'so bad it's good' territory.Oh, sure, if you put me in the same room with an angry cobra or a hungry reticulated python I'm probably going to be terrified, but that's not what I mean. While it does have some major shortcomings, like how atrociously fake KaDee Strickland’s Southern accent becomes sporadically through the film, it’s ultimately a worthwhile sequel, and holds its own in the ranks of movies about killer reptiles.įor horror fans who love cheesy creature features or the killer animal sub-genres, Anaconda and Anaconda: Hunt for the Blood Orchid are absolutely worth watching thanks to satisfying snake kills, comedic writing, and enjoyable characters. Thanks to the more nuanced plot and less budget spent on well-known actors, this film is able to do a lot more, and thus feels significantly more satisfying than any of the other Anaconda films. Related: The 10 Best New Movie Monster Characters Of The Decade, Ranked
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |